-
Colby Football Falls to Middlebury at Home

Following a road defeat to the Williams College Ephs a week prior, the Colby football team returned home this past Saturday to face off against the Middlebury Panthers. Despite a strong first half and 200 yards of total offense from quarterback Miles Drake `26, the Mules were defeated by a score of 27-17. With a large crowd of over 400 in attendance on a beautiful fall day, the Mules received the opening kickoff and began their first drive from their own 25-yard line. Drake converted a third-down pass to Jack Nye `28 to extend the drive, before a Middlebury pass interference penalty in the next series set Colby up for a first and ten at midfield. Drake was unable to connect on two consecutive pass attempts to Cormac Wright `26, and the Mules were forced to punt.
Eli Soehren `27 pinned the Panthers at their own four-yard line with an excellent 44-yard punt, and the Colby defense took the field for the first time. Middlebury picked up two quick first downs with a 15-yard reception by Mike Ahonen and a strong run from Connor McClellan, advancing to their own 34-yard line. There, they were stopped on consecutive runs before quarterback Brian Moran found Ahonen for another 15 yards on third down. In the next series, the Mules’ defense successfully defended a pair of passes, and the Panthers were forced to punt. Middlebury punter Ty Brinkmann’s punt was deflected by Colby’s Jack Mullen `26, traveling only nineteen yards, and Colby took over at their own 25.
On the second play of the drive, Drake found Soehren, who plays tight end in addition to punting, across the middle of the field for a first down. Soehren bounced off a pair of Middlebury defenders, rumbling all the way down to the Middlebury 25-yard line for a gain of forty-five yards. On the ensuing second down, running back Ryan Singhal `27 took Drake’s handoff and ran for 17 yards, giving the Mules a first-and-goal at the Middlebury six-yard line. A further pair of runs from Singhal pounded the ball down to the one, and Antone Moreis `27 punched the ball in on third down for a Colby touchdown. Kicker Will Schneider `29 converted the extra point, and Middlebury took the ball back at their twenty-five following a touchback.
Middlebury struggled to respond to the opening touchdown, as their offense was unable to pick up a first down, going three-and-out and punting back to the Mules. Colby matched with a three-and-out of their own, with Drake taking a nine-yard sack. Soehren punted back to the Panthers, who embarked on a long drive into Colby territory, highlighted by big pickups by Caleb Smith on passes from his quarterback Moran. The drive stalled at the Mules’ twenty-seven yard line, but Middlebury kicker Tony Wang was unable to capitalize, missing his fourty-three yard field goal attempt. With time dwindling in the first half, Colby marched down the field with a series of short-yardage plays, before Drake kept the ball himself and scored on a fifteen-yard run to put the Mules up thirteen points. But it was not to be, as the touchdown was called back for a blindside block penalty, pushing the Mules back to the Middlebury thirty-one yardline. Following a completion to Nye to bring them within field goal range, the Mules took a ten-point lead, with Schneider nailing a thirty-seven yard field goal.
In the second half, Middlebury took the ball the length of the field and scored their first touchdown on a two-yard Moran pass to Ollie Orvis. Now leading by only three, the Mules went three-and-out on offense, mishandling a fake punt in the process to give the ball back to the Panthers deep in Colby territory. The Panthers made quick work of the situation, scoring a touchdown and taking their first lead of the afternoon, 14-10. Colby got the ball back and again could not move the chains, with Drake throwing an interception that again gave the Panthers excellent field position. Fortunately, the Mules earned a turnover on downs following a big fourth down stop by Drew Ramos `27.
Colby was able to utilize the opportunity by driving downfield and scoring on an excellent run by Drake, made possible by an earlier 30-yard carry by Singhal. Back in the lead at 17-14, the Mules kicked it back to the Panthers, who broke out with a sixty-six yard touchdown run by McClellan to retake the advantage, 21-17. Colby again went three-and-out, giving the Panthers another offensive chance with five and a half minutes remaining. The Mule defense stopped Middlebury, who still managed to take five minutes off the clock, punting back to Colby with less than a minute left to play. On the first play of the game-deciding drive, Drake threw an interception to Middlebury’s Charlie Grant, who returned it for a touchdown, sealing the Panthers’ victory.
Sitting at 1-2 through the first month of their season, the football team plays away at Bates College next weekend in their opening CBB game, before returning home to play the defending NESCAC champions Wesleyan University.
~ Matt Quealy `26
-
Colby Men’s Soccer Opens Season Strong under New Head Coach

With newly appointed Head Coach Sean Elvert at the helm, the Colby men’s soccer team has kicked off the 2025 season with intent. Having gone through an intense two-week preseason involving twice-daily training sessions, the Mules entered their opener against Thomas College eager to showcase their hard work and set the tone for the campaign this season.
September 2, at Bill Alfond Field, under the lights, with a deafening home crowd cheering, Colby set the tone. Junior center back Jacob Sams `27 ended a scoreless deadlock in the second half with a thunderous strike from the edge of the box to spark a wave of momentum. First-year midfielder Jude Gussen `29 tallied two clinical goals, and junior Joseph Beshel `27 calmly scored a penalty to cap a 4–1 victory and the team’s first of the year.
Just four days later, the Mules played longtime rival Bowdoin College in a high-quality early-season contest. Unable to get back on a determined second half, Colby fell 2–1 to the Polar Bears, as freshman forward Santi Canencio `29 tallied one back from the penalty spot following Bowdoin’s building of a two-goal advantage.
Colby roared back quickly, taking a 2–1 midweek victory over the University of Southern Maine thanks to goals from senior forward Chase Dolinko `26 and junior Charlie Scott `27. That energy was transferred into their second NESCAC game against a strong Tufts University team, as the Mules battled to a gritty 0–0 tie, earning a hard-fought conference point.
The winning streak continued on the road with a 3–1 win over Saint Joseph’s College of Maine, highlighted by a composed finish in the attack. Next was the trip to New London, Connecticut, where Colby faced Connecticut College. Down a goal, the Mules showed resilience, tying late in the second half when first-year midfielder Leo Robison `29 struck the ball in on a corner.
Colby closed out the stretch with a dominating 2–0 victory at Endicott College in Beverly, Massachusetts. Gussen `29 opened the scoring with a first-half goal, and sophomore forward Anthony Bugliari `28 sealed the 2–0 margin after halftime as the Mules controlled the contest from start to finish.
Now riding a wave of strong performances, the Mules head back to Massachusetts for their toughest test yet: a grueling NESCAC doubleheader featuring powerhouse Williams College on September 27 and reigning NCAA champion Amherst College the following day. With their current form and growing confidence, Coach Elvert’s squad will look to steal crucial points and prove they belong among the league’s elite.
Senior forward Dolinko, a key leader in his senior year, praised the team for its combination of veteran leadership and rookie depth.
“We have an excellent first-year class and a lot of new transfers that have played significant roles, on the field and in the locker room,” Dolinko added. “They’ve certainly contributed positively to the team and made an impact instantly.”
Reflecting upon the team’s hard-fought tie at Connecticut College, Dolinko added, “The game was tough; we definitely would have liked more than a point, but Leo scored a great goal in the dying minutes, and we were happy with the way the boys worked up until the final whistle.”
Dolinko, who graduates after JanPlan, has been an important part of Elvert’s squad and is determined to get the Mules rolling towards a much-coveted postseason trip.
Colby has not captured a NESCAC championship since 2018, but this season’s squad is intent on fixing that. With their recent play grabbing attention around the league, the Mules have established themselves as a team that will not be left behind.
We wish them the best of luck on the road and hope to see the Mules bring valuable points back to Waterville as they move along with their run this season.
~ Kameron Mohammed `29
-
Hearing from Colby Students: The New Definitions of Freedom of Speech in the Arts

On January 20, 2025 after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, the White House released an executive order titled, “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship.” The announcement was a continuation of Trump’s campaign promises to uphold first amendment rights, which the administration suggested were weakened by Biden-era federal oversight that “under the guise of combatting ‘misinformation,’ ‘disinformation,’ and ‘malinformation’ …infringed on the constitutionally protected speech rights of American citizens” and “advanced the Government’s preferred narrative about significant matters of public debate.” Even more patently, the executive order asserts that “government censorship of speech is intolerable in a free society.” But recently, the Trump administration’s loyalty to these foundational values has come under question — particularly due to the government’s influence on comedy.
NPR reported earlier this year that Paramount and Trump reached a 16 million dollar settlement after claims CBS’ Face the Nation and 60 Minutes assisted in election interference by televising different portions of Kamala Harris’ response to a question about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Shortly after, on July 17, 2025, CBS announced the cancellation of Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show, citing financial reasons.
Now, once again, late night comedy is facing disturbances after controversial comments Jimmy Kimmel made regarding the death of Charlie Kirk. While on air, Kimmel stated that “the MAGA gang [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” After FCC Chair Brendan Carr called this “some of the sickest conduct possible,” Nexstar Media Group announced the replacement of Kimmel’s show with different programming, triggering ABC to suspend the talk show indefinitely.
Mass cancellations of Hulu, ESPN, and Disney+ bundles contributed to an estimated four billion dollars in market value lost from short term trades within a week of the announcement, according to an article published by Yahoo. Although, it is unclear if these fluctuations were solely due to backlash or a combination of situations, such as coincidentally ending subscription periods, temporary hiatuses, or genuine permanent cancellations as a means of boycott.
The changing definitions of what constitutes free speech in America poses both national and local consequences. It prompts the questions: What are the boundaries of personal opinion and public overstep? What speech is allowed — is disparate political speech permissible in the current administrative climate? How do the foundational systems which support free speech in the arts— writers, comedians, actors— respond to these new confines?
Shayna Purow `26, an art major at the College, explained that she thinks “the political climate has shifted the way artists feel about expressing themselves nationally.” However, she notes that while “it’s encouraged deeper dialogue, it’s also created increasingly polarized environments where funding decisions, public reaction, and even safety concerns can influence what work gets shown.”
Purow believes “creative spaces should make room for all perspectives, even difficult ones, because that’s how art challenges us and how communities grow. Protecting artistic freedom and allowing artists to express themselves without fear of censorship, while also practicing respect and responsibility, feels essential.”
Another student, who wishes to remain anonymous, had similar sentiments, explaining, “I do feel like the political climate has shifted the bounds of freedom of speech and expression within the arts…it’s a lot more contentious right now.”
Finding communal agreement on what constitutes freedom of speech does not only weigh heavy on the minds of artists and entertainers at the national level, but in much more personal settings, too. There is a continuously fierce debate surrounding First Amendment rights on college campuses. At Colby, what constitutes respectful articulation of opinions remains vague in definition. However, both students I talked to are hopeful with regard to the College’s approach to student discourse as well as response to pressures at the federal level.
~ Maya Corrie `29
-
Moldova Stands Firm: Democracy on Europe’s Frontier

A tiny country, often cited as the poorest in Europe and home to the world’s largest wine cellar, has become the subject of intense political conversation for the past three weeks. Moldova, nestled between Romania and Ukraine, held parliamentary elections on September 28, 2025. This election comes a year after its population chose a decisively pro-European path by re-electing a pro-European president and enshrining its commitment to European Union (EU) membership in its constitution, signaling a clear break from its historical ties to Russia.
While continuing its military aggression in Ukraine, the Kremlin, or the Russian government, has also intensified its hybrid war against Moldova by attempting to engineer support for pro-Russian candidates. Moldova has long served as a buffer zone between what Russia envisions as its sphere of influence and the West, which Vladimir Putin views as a threat to Russian sovereignty. However, as Moldova began reforming its government and reducing dependence on Russian goods such as gas and trade through multiple partnerships with the EU, Moscow grew increasingly wary.
In March 2024, the London-based think tank Chatham House identified Moldova’s societal cohesion and public information space as the two areas least resilient to Russian malign influence. While broad public support exists for democracy, confidence in EU integration is weaker, and deep mistrust of institutions undermines social unity. At the same time, Moldova’s information environment remains highly exposed: weak regulation, slow responses from social media platforms, and active Russian disinformation campaigns make it a key front in hybrid warfare. Cuts to U.S. support, including $22 million for democratic processes and $32 million for independent media, left Moldova particularly vulnerable to Russian influence, weakening its ability to counter disinformation and maintain societal cohesion.
Last fall exposed these vulnerabilities further, as Moldova held presidential elections and a referendum on joining the EU. Ahead of the elections, a local news outlet uncovered a network of activists paid to recruit so-called simpatizanți (supporters) to vote against the pro-European incumbent, Maia Sandu, and the EU membership referendum. Coordinated by the fugitive Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor, based in Moscow, these activists were paid slightly over $150, or around 2500 Moldovan leu monthly. Directives from Moscow were delivered via Telegram, one of Russia’s preferred channels for disseminating disinformation.
Despite these efforts, Sandu, the pro-EU incumbent, won with 55.35% of the vote, thanks largely to overwhelming support from the Moldovan diaspora. The path to EU membership was also enshrined in the constitution, though the razor-thin margin of the referendum victory (50.35%) illustrates how dangerously close Moldova was to undermining four years of progress.
Russia has since diversified its hybrid warfare tactics. While Telegram remained the primary channel of communication with activists operating under the name InfoLider, this election also saw the creation and spread of hundreds of fake posts on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. This has promoted anti-EU narratives and targeted the Sandu administration.
On Telegram, recruited activists received instructions from intermediaries acting as a communication bridge between the Kremlin and Moldova. These leaders assigned tasks, set posting schedules, and dictated content. At one point, they even referred to themselves as a “bot farm,” explaining to recruits that their role was to coordinate and reframe news stories to create the illusion of many independent voices rather than a single source.
These mediated news stories aligned with the discourse of Moldovan pro-Russian parties, emphasizing security and sovereignty concerns, such as the claim that pursuing EU membership could drag the country into war with Russia, or that Moldova’s identity is incompatible with Western values. After completing tasks, such as posting online content criticizing President Maia Sandu, activists were paid “directly from Moscow,” with salaries ranging from 600 to 3,000 leu ($35–$180) disbursed in rubles via the Russian state-owned Promsvyazbank, in euros directly to Moldovan bank accounts, or through cryptocurrency accounts.
The National Anticorruption Center and the Central Electoral Commission remained vigilant, intervening where possible by seizing illicit funds and removing corrupt candidates from the ballot. Yet election meddling and hybrid warfare are difficult to confront: they operate in the shadows, making them hard to detect and even harder to stop.
On the eve of elections, the government braced for significant disruptions. On September 24, 2025, Moldovan police seized 200 pre-stamped ballots in favor of the Alternativa Bloc, a self-proclaimed pro-European party alliance with deep Kremlin connections. According to authorities, the ballots were intended for a ‘carousel’ scheme, a method of electoral fraud in which an already stamped ballot is inserted into the ballot box, while a clean ballot is removed to be stamped later and used by another voter in exchange for money.
The pre-stamped ballots intensified fears of election interference. Election day also saw bomb threats at several voting stations abroad, as well as massive cyberattacks on government websites, including the Central Electoral Commission. Bomb threats occurred in European cities like Brussels, Rome, Genoa, Bucharest, and Alicante.
Despite being the target of Kremlin hybrid warfare, Moldova successfully stood its ground. On Sunday, September 28, 2025, Moldovans elected a new parliament, securing a pro-EU parliamentary majority. With a voter turnout of 52%, the Party of Action and Solidarity, or PAS, founded by President Sandu, won 50.2% of votes and 55 out of 101 seats in the Parliament. Despite losing eight seats compared to the 2021 elections, PAS remained the principal choice for pro-EU supporters, sending a clear signal about Moldova’s determination to pursue the Western-aligned trajectory enshrined in its constitution. The results also underscore the country’s resilience, both domestically and abroad. Since 2020, Moldova has held four elections, two presidential and two parliamentary, in which the diaspora consistently voted overwhelmingly for pro-EU candidates. A common feeling among Moldovans abroad is that “we see how many opportunities are available out there, and we want the same for those who are still home.”
Moldova’s story is an example of how the small countries on Europe’s frontier face enormous pressures, from overt military threats to covert information warfare. Yet, even under intense scrutiny and manipulation, their citizens can defend democratic choice and assert sovereignty. For Moldova, the path toward the EU is no longer just a constitutional commitment but also a statement of resilience in the shadow of Russian power.
~ Cristina Panaguta `26
-
Conversations about Music at Colby

Around this time last year, I wrote an Arts and Entertainment article for The Colby Echo titled, ‘Finding the Colby in Colby Symphony Orchestra.’ Using student interviews and the orchestra roster as references, the article addressed the lack of student musicians in the orchestra and the question of identity — whether the orchestra’s addition of ‘ringers,’ or hired musicians, affects the spirit of the orchestra. A year has passed, and with changes to the music department faculty and the class of 2025 having graduated, I had the opportunity to interview more music students across class years and compile their perspectives on the orchestra or the Music Department at large. Furthermore, I was able to compare the roster for this concert season from that of preceding years to discern a trend in musician composition.
Oluwatobi Olufowobi `26, pianist, described his musical experience at Colby as follows:
“It’s been a great experience for me, getting to know specialists who have great depth and breadth in their craft, as well as the penchant for teaching. The majority of my music experience had been under Professor Funahashi, who was my second major music mentor. The last three years have been really eye-opening. It was my first time being truly exposed to the hidden and less perceived parts of classical music. Each semester, we had weekly learning sessions that would culminate in recitals at the end of the semester.”
“Prior to being at Colby, my experiences on stage were rare, so it was a surprising change of pace to be exposed, and could be quite anxiety-inducing, presenting what you’d been practicing frequently for months all in one go. But yeah, it’s been great so far, learning about people in the music department and how it runs. It’s been an especially nice change moving the center from Bixler to Gordon, as it’s a much bigger space with a lot of flexibility. I’ve liked the better streamlining of events, increasing their visibility and general participative aspects. My favorite events have been the orchestral series, considering it’s what I’m into the most. And of course, the various end of semester recitals give the opportunity to see the variety of talents on various instruments. It’s been a pleasure to see things improving all around, so apart from a few things regarding event dates and timings, which are honestly too subjective to consider, there isn’t much I’d really change.”
Olufowobi concludes positively, expressing that it’s been an honor getting to hear pieces and watch beautifully-crafted performances, all while getting to know the incredible people that make it worthwhile.
A first-year string player who wished to stay anonymous also described their experience in a positive light, especially concerning the orchestra and its musician composition.
“I have been playing in the Colby orchestra for many years, even before I was a student here, (and) everyone was so welcoming, students and teachers…We used to have a bigger orchestra, but this year our string section is really small. Our cellos section though, has a lot. I’m not sure why our section is getting smaller, I think we focus a lot on recruiting sports teams but not really musicians that we are in need of – and I don’t think there are too many (ringers), because without them we wouldn’t have much of a string section at all. I love the ringers/mentors very much, but I do wish we had more students.”
William Muller `26, percussionist, offered a contrasting perspective that emphasized the issues stemming from lack of student musicians in the orchestra:
“I’ve played in the orchestra since fall 2022, except for spring 2025 because my Mondays were too busy. I’m not sure if there’s been any positive changes recently except this semester when [a percussion instructor, a first-year musician] and I successfully advocated for the first-year student to be able to play timpani on the Tchaikovsky Pathetique.”
Muller offers a simple way to ensure this doesn’t happen again: give students a more prominent role in each concert. “This shouldn’t be given as a privilege but rather an expectation of excellence and challenging oneself to go outside your comfort zone. This way, the orchestra is more of a community of learning and growing rather than just simply an elite ensemble propped up by professionals that would crumble to the ground if they weren’t there. All of the ringers are very nice and amazing people. The only thing that needs to change is their role should be more about instruction and helping students to be successful rather than covering all of the difficult parts so students don’t have to rely on them.”
A common thread in both interviews about the orchestra is that the ringers themselves are great musicians and mentors; it is the lack of student musicians that necessitates the employment of hired musicians. However, the second interviewee highlights the importance of continuing to give student musicians a prominent role, despite the necessity of having ringers. Furthermore, it shows an example of an orchestral section where there are sufficient student musicians, yet they are substituted by professional musicians who play more substantial parts. According to the October 2025 roster, the orchestra has 25 student musicians out of the 53 total. This is not to say that all 28 non-student musicians are hired musicians, as there are community members and faculties from other departments that play in the orchestra. However, we do see a reduced number of students compared to the roster from October 2024, where 28 out of 69 musicians were students. At the same time, we see less non-student musicians, from 41 last year to 28 this concert season. The question of identity still remains, but the lack of student musicians may be inevitable for a small liberal arts college like ours. To address this, it is crucial that the orchestra be more accessible to students of varying musical backgrounds by letting inclusion be a higher priority than the repertoire or musical quality of the orchestra themselves.
~ Benjamin Ha `27
-
New Year, New Dining

The College made the switch of the century this year, saying goodbye to Bon Appétit and hello to Parkhurst Dining as the new dining services partner. Colby started working with Bon Appétit in 2016 but decided to make the change based on the opinions of students, faculty, and staff.
Parkhurst Dining is committed to several core values: caring about people, being passionate about food, seeking innovation, being fiscally responsible, and advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion. The company is family-owned, emphasizing cooking from scratch, sustainable practices, collaboration, and customization. Additionally, all previous hourly dining staff were offered employment and benefits from Parkhurst. These principles and qualities are obviously important, but let’s be honest, what matters most to students is quite simple: the food.
In the past few years, several interesting (to put it kindly) food combinations have graced our dining halls. Probably most notable is the blueberry chipotle barbecue roasted chicken, which made its rounds on Fizz. Following options like this, students were optimistic about a fresh start and a new dining experience.
In the first two weeks of the semester, this hopefulness seemed to be paying off. Comparatively, the food improved, and the selections were more conventional. However, campus talk and Fizz posts have proved that this was short-lived. Tony Silva `26 expresses that “the dining hall quality has noticeably increased, but the options are still limited.” Many students are returning to the pizza and pasta stations because they can’t seem to find anything appetizing.
As a vegetarian, I’ve found myself searching for food I can eat, often walking back to my table with a salad in hand. Claire Walsh `28, also a vegetarian, says that “I think they can do a better job providing more variety and more food overall, especially at Roberts.”
This isn’t to say that there have been no improvements. Dana’s hummus bar is a step in the right direction, as is Roberts’ smoothie bar. The Spa’s mobile ordering system is also a great advancement, especially for students with early morning and back-to-back classes. Nevertheless, overall, the switch doesn’t seem like much of an upgrade.
Other changes have been implemented in an attempt to enhance the dining experience. Hours have expanded, with Roberts serving dinner until 9:00 p.m. This extra hour is particularly beneficial for student-athletes and those with late-night meetings and activities. Unfortunately, from 12:00-1:00 p.m., the dining halls remain the last place you want to find yourself. Lines are sometimes out the door, and tables are impossible to find. Moreover, the tableware is different. The gray plates add an air of elegance to the dining halls (where they’re found), but I know I’m not alone when I say I miss the old bowls.
School has only been in session for one month, so there is still plenty of time for voices to be heard and changes to be made. Parkhurst utilizes focus groups, engages with the Student Government Association and campus organizations, and provides opportunities for students to vote on new dining concepts. As stated in an email by Dean of the College Gustavo Burkett, “This means our dining program will constantly evolve based on what matters most to you.”
We are thankful that the College is working to transform students’ experiences. Regarding dining, we ultimately want to see variety and quality — these traits should go hand in hand with each other.
Only time will tell if Parkhurst can create a dining experience that meets both student expectations and appetites.
~ Jaydn Liebman `26
-
The Knock Heard Around Campus: Colby Democrats Club Is Back

Last year, the College’s Democrats club had only three active members. Meetings were sparse, momentum was limited, and the club itself felt almost invisible on campus. Now, just a year later, the group has grown to almost 300 members and has already started to cement its hold on the College’s community.
Jakob De Swaan Arons `26, the president of the Democrats club, Uma Graz `28, vice president, and Will Kaine `26, treasurer, came together to build up what had been forgotten.
“The thing that motivated me to restart it was when I came back from abroad,” Arons said. “Trump got inaugurated, a flurry of things happened, and I was just really frustrated with the current situation. So I reached out to Will, who was abroad with me, and Uma was the only one who showed up to the first meeting. We needed three positions, and there we got three positions all of a sudden.”
From there, the club slowly rebuilt itself. Last year was about brainstorming, but this year, the team of three came in with a plan. At the club fair alone, they signed more than 100 students, eventually reaching 280 on their mailing list.
“Honestly, I wanted to hear about the issues that are most important to everyone,” Arons said. “I was surprised to hear a lot of people said immigration rights … another one is wealth in equality.”
The leadership team commented on the fact that they have worked to set a different tone from past years. Previously, the club was said to be “more performative,” as Graz explained. Arons added, “We do want to maintain a lightheartedness … but the main thing that’ll separate us from things in the past is we’re trying to do concrete things. So whether that’s canvassing, letter writing, or poster making, everything we do is meant to generate support.”
Earlier this month, members of the club had the opportunity to take that generation of support off campus. The club organized a canvassing trip in Waterville, where students went door-to-door.
“I’ll be honest, I don’t think we really did prepare people that much, and I was really proud of seeing how they stepped up,” Arons said. “Two freshmen knocked on a door, spoke with an independent and a conservative, and still convinced them that they should vote no on Question One.” Question One is a referendum on the Maine ballot this November, which supports the change of election procedure law by requiring voters proof of photo identification, limiting the number of drop boxes per municipality to one, among other changes.
The story about the Democrats club isn’t just about its growth in this semester. Arons pointed to the bigger, long-term picture: “As I mentioned, there was a complacency that came with the fact that we had a Democratic president…the Maine College Dems, which is a statewide organization, has completely fallen apart and is now rebuilding. We’ve reached out to other schools like Bates and Bowdoin, and I can only assume they’re facing similar issues that we did. Our vision for the future is ensuring that Uma and Grace and other really involved members are prepared to continue the legacy and make this a club that is a pillar of Colby once again.”
Kaine echoed that point, emphasizing the importance of outside connections. “Passionate people are realizing that they can do something about it, and so building connections between Colby Dems, Maine Dems, and other organizations to keep this thing going. It’s all to make Colby’s students feel like there is a real pathway for them to get directly involved.”
Those connections are already beginning to take shape. “Jared Gold’s campaign reached out to me today and asked for a campaign fellow,” Kaine added. “That kind of stuff would be really, really great. If we can get Senate candidates to come here and speak to students…getting this campus more politically active, that is another thing I hope lies into the general constitution.”
From three students filling the required leadership positions, to hundreds of names on the mailing list, the College’s Democrats club has quickly established themselves on campus. This highlights not only its revival, but the importance of student groups as spaces for open dialogue and inquiry. Club leaders emphasize the necessity of creating a space where participation and open expression are welcomed in order to cultivate productive conversations that matter. Now, the Colby Democrats’ club focuses on sustaining these conversations and growth, but that depends on how deeply students continue to get involved.
~ Mia Dinunzio `28
-
Guzmán: Curiosity, Not Conflict, is the Key to Mending Political Divisions

Last week, Mónica Guzmán, author of the bestselling book I Never Thought of It That Way, addressed an audience in Page Commons, focusing on practical steps individuals can take to bridge the United States’ pronounced political divisions. As a Senior Fellow for Public Practice at the non-profit Braver Angels, Guzmán’s work centers on changing not how we view issues, but how we view one another. Her talk emphasized curiosity as a tool for de-escalation, beginning with an individual’s own biological responses.
Guzmán opened the conversation by addressing the initial, involuntary, physical reactions that surface during heated political disagreements. When facing a challenging statement, she noted that the unqualified answer to controlling the first emotional impulse is, you don’t. Instead, she stressed the importance of awareness, urging people to build the practice of listening to their body for signals like a pounding heart or quickened blood. This physical response is often a manifestation of a “fight, flight, freeze, fawn” trauma response, signifying fear. Guzmán stated clearly that “curiosity and fear can’t really work together.” Once one is aware of the emotion, they gain agency, allowing them to take a break or, crucially, “name the emotion to this other person,” turning it into “data in your conversation.”
This strategy of contained, deliberate engagement extends to the setting of political discussions. She maintained that the most effective conversations are held where people are mutually free to explore more honestly without fallouts. In group dynamics, individuals often fall into unhelpful roles; the “sniper” who puts in a “little poke” or the “gladiator” looking for a fight. Guzmán advised that the role to take on is the “engager,” who asks a curious question to bring the temperature down and let the other person know they’re in a place where they can be heard.
The discussion eventually turned to student questions. Winnie Ulland `28, a sophomore art history and English major, asked for “one everyday question you would encourage people to bring into their daily practice to build bridges and reinforce curiosity.” Guzmán offered a precise linguistic recommendation: “How did you come to believe what you believe?” She explicitly cautioned the audience against asking, “why do you believe what you believe?” Guzmán explained that in contexts of disagreement or suspicion, the word ‘why’ can be very charged and sound more like an accusation, causing the listener to feel defensive. Instead of plumbing their own depths, they will think about the reasons they have heard others give that sounded strong and confident to get the person off their case, ultimately closing the door to genuine dialogue.
Guzmán also addressed the pervasive influence of media, noting its polarizing force in an ecosystem where people tend to find outlets that reinforce their own sentiments about the world. This environment feeds the “perception gap,” where people hold big misperceptions that we have about each other. She explained that news media often fails by providing “misinformation about what’s in people’s hearts,” instead appealing to emotion and giving readers “ammo against the other side.”
For individuals unwilling to engage directly with an opponent, Guzmán offered a mental challenge for consuming opposing media. When reading an article from the other side, she urged the reader to ask two private questions, not reading the article “for ammo.” The questions are: “what are the honest concerns that are informing this person’s point of view?” and “what is the strongest argument for their side?” These allow one to wrestle with the ideas privately and leave a little more room for what they might be missing, she said.
During a follow-up, another student asked how one can balance curiosity with vulnerability to ensure that asking too many questions does not feel like “interviewing them.” Guzmán, drawing on her experience as a journalist, stated she would try very hard not to interview people, but to have a conversation with them. The crucial technique is to open up first, making it easier for the other person. She suggested sharing a personal experience, such as, “this thing happened to me once, and then I felt this way. And you know, this happened to you. How did that feel for you?” By establishing that you and I are not that different, one creates a sense of safety, encouraging the other person to be themselves.
Guzmán concluded by acknowledging that humans are “wired to divide in some ways” through the dynamics of sorting, othering, and siloing. However, she provided hope by reminding the audience that people are also fundamentally “wired to connect.” This natural desire for connection, she suggested, is the powerful mechanism that makes it possible to bridge divides.
~ Stephen Owusu Badu `27
-
Invasive Beetle Threatens the Perkins Arboretum

Emerald ash borers (EAB) are small beetles, each less than an inch long. Adults have shiny green outer shells; larvae are white. They are diurnal creatures, preferring warm, sunny days. And when there’s signs of them in your area, you can rest assured that they will eat through every ash tree they come across.
The EAB is one of thousands of invasive species existing across the United States. As defined by the National Wildlife Federation, an invasive species is “any kind of living organism that is not native to an ecosystem and causes harm.” EABs have spread across Europe and North America despite being native to Asia. Everywhere they travel, they decimate the ash tree population, and Maine was recently added to their hit list.
In 2022, the state of Maine received its first report of definitive signs of EAB on the edge of the College’s campus. Since then, the relentless insects have overtaken the entire ash population within the Perkins Arboretum. According to Colby Senior Laboratory Instructor Abby Pearson, the person responsible for making the report, “everywhere that [she’s seen] ash on campus, [there has been] some indication of EAB, and anywhere that there’s EAB, the general understanding is that just about all the ash trees will be dead within ten years.”
This is a grim prophecy. Ash trees are a crucial part of the Arboretum’s ecosystem (and many other ecosystems across Europe and North America). They play an essential role in the life cycles of a wide variety of species. In some patches of the arboretum, ash are among the most common trees. And with these patches of ash trees dying out so suddenly, invasive plant species biding time underneath the canopy will take these openings as an opportunity to flourish.
Not only are ash trees important to Maine ecosystems, they are also very culturally significant for members of the Wabanaki Confederacy, a confederation made up of the four most prominent indigenous tribes in Maine. Basketmaking is a longstanding cultural tradition, a method of economic empowerment, and an outlet for artistic expression for Wabanaki peoples, and the brown ash is the main material used in this practice. For the Wabanaki, losing ash trees means losing part of their cultural identity.
Although the EAB is a worthy opponent, all hope is not lost. Shared interest in preserving ash trees has brought Wabanaki basketmakers, environmental conservationists, and the government together to form the Brown Ash Task Force. This group works to monitor ash population counts throughout Maine and harvest seeds from remaining ash trees to replenish the population and make sure they are not wiped out completely.
In the past, a major strategy employed to combat invasive species issues harming trees, such as chestnut blight and dutch elm disease, was to get ahead of the invasive species and cut down vulnerable trees, preventing the issue from spreading further.
The strategy the Brown Ash Task Force employs is the opposite. The hope, as explained by Pearson, is that “even though most will die, there will likely be a few that don’t, and those will be the resistant ones. Those are the genes that you want to propagate.” Collecting seeds from the trees that seem to be surviving the EAB influx will allow for the propagation of new trees that might be resistant.
Additionally, various research groups are utilizing the College’s arboretum to test other methods of protecting ash trees. A study currently being conducted by the Maine Forest Service and the Ash Protection Collaboration Across Waponahkik is centered around insecticide. Researchers have treated 200 ash trees on campus by drilling small holes in the bark and injecting the insecticide into the wood, where it is then carried up through the trunk by the tree’s vascular tissue and consumed by any EABs that attempt to feed on the tree. The results of the ten-year study will provide valuable insight into how the war against the EAB can be waged.
Another project, also led by the Maine Forest Service, focuses on introducing the EAB’s natural predator into the environment. Pearson has a hands-on role in this project, receiving shipments of tiny parasitoid wasps which feed on EAB larvae and releasing them into the arboretum weekly. These wasps pose no threat to humans and, though Pearson says there are “always questions about introducing new species,” she adds that “it should be that these parasitoid wasps are incredibly host-specific… and that’s what they’ve been shown to be so far.”
EABs are not the only invasive species to disturb the arboretum. Most recently, a nematode has brought a beech leaf disease to campus beech trees, which were already struggling due to a bark disease caused by a different invasive species. Various other species, such as the spruce budworm, whose population here waxes and wanes over time, and the spongy moth, a caterpillar that particularly likes apple trees and oaks, have come to call the College home. An especially unfortunate addition to the list is the browntailed moth which, in addition to doing a number on oak and fruit trees, causes an itchy rash on human skin.
Pearson predicts that the hemlock trees are next. The hemlock wooly adelgid, an insect native to Japan that feeds on hemlock sap, has made its way up the east coast from Virginia to Maine. It is only a matter of time before it reaches the College.
While efforts are being made to check the EAB population and protect our ash trees, there is no question that they have already made their mark. The scale of the damage will be measured this spring, in the Forest Ecosystems class, led by Professor Justin Bechnell, the Associate Professor of Environmental Studies. Each year, the class does an ash monitoring project, which includes revisiting permanent plots in the arboretum and collecting information on ash population and signs of EABs. The class wasn’t offered this past year, but it was for several years in a row before, and for those classes the ash project was primarily theoretical, predicting how the ecosystem would be changed when EABs eventually overtook it. Now that the ruthless little beetles have made a noticeable impact, the project will undoubtedly look very different.
Walking the trails, it is easy to spot dead ash trees with the EAB’s signature markings: serpentine tunnels underneath the bark where the larvae feast and small, D-shaped holes from which adult beetles emerge. For most of the year, while most of the trees are leafy and green, the barren, dead ash create a jarring contrast. Pearson left me with a haunting description of her view as she walked through the arboretum this past spring:
“It’s really obvious to me that…there’s a lot of dead trees, and their branches are just so stark and obvious. They have these big, thick branches because they have to hold up these big, compound leaves—their leaves are a foot long, and heavy. So they have these big, thick twigs, and they just look so stark against the sky.”
~ Anna Izquierdo `29
-
Campus News Goes on Air with New Echo–WMHB Collaboration

Colby students are about to have a new way to get their campus news. The Colby Echo and WMHB, Colby’s independent FM radio station, have launched a partnership that brings student journalism to the airwaves. After a lively launch party last week, the two organizations officially kicked off a weekly talk-and-music show that highlights stories from the Echo and shares them with listeners across Waterville and beyond.
Mia Dinunzio `28, the News Section Editor at the Echo and a member of WMHB, described her new role as “bridging the gap between the Echo and the radio station.” She explained that the radio will highlight articles from the Echo’s most recent issue, giving listeners a quick rundown of what’s happening on campus. Rather than relying solely on print or online editions, the radio show offers a fresh platform for sharing campus news. The goal is to make Echo coverage more accessible, whether students are tuning in from a dining hall or members of the greater Waterville community are listening off-campus.
The show, which debuts this Friday from 9–10 a.m., will feature a roundup of this week’s stories and, starting next week, interviews with Echo writers and other campus voices. “I’m going to start doing interviews as well for certain topics that are being discussed—faculty, reporters, maybe even other Colby students,” Dinunzio said. She added that the station also plans to run promos to cast a spotlight on arts events at Colby. “We’ll be highlighting the Arts and Entertainment section, but also highlighting events happening at the Gordon Center, in case any Waterville residents want to come.”
Dinunzio noted that there had been a previous attempt at a news hour on WMHB by Christian Gobo, `26, WMHB station manager and president, but not in collaboration with the Echo. “I think a little over a year ago, Christian had tried a news hour. However, I don’t think it was affiliated with the Echo, it was just him finding general national [and] Waterville news,” she says. “This is directly correlated to [the Echo], so it’s trying to amplify the articles and the pieces that are already talked about.”
Gobo confirmed that the new show is building on past efforts. “We tried to do something like this two years ago, when I say we, I mean mostly me,” he said. “It was very elaborate, a lot of moving parts to it. We had reporters, a team of student reporters that were out getting audio stories and editing them. And then after a while, I was just like, commitment—it’s hard to pump something like that out every single week of that quality, of that complexity. So after a semester, we brushed it under the rug.” But I’ve always had in the back of my head that I wanted to do something like that again, until Mia came along, and I figured that would be a good opportunity.”
The experience gives Gobo perspective on what makes this new effort different, he says, and why it feels more sustainable. With Mia helping to connect the two organizations, he sees this as a chance to bring his original idea to life in a more realistic way.
That excitement carried into the launch party, which Gobo described as “perfectly presented chaos.” He gestured at the scene: stacked pizza boxes, people running around setting up equipment, and students chatting over music. “That’s radio,” he said. “People are running all over the place, the adrenaline is flowing. But the audience doesn’t know that, right? All that they get is sort of the perfected polished version of that. That’s a testament to, you know, the skills of the DJs here, the collaboration, everybody has a different, specialized role.”
~ Sophia Ikiri `29
